For Christmas I received an interesting gift from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.

Yet it was totally composed by AI, with a few basic prompts about me provided by my friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and really amusing in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, bryggeriklubben.se and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty design of writing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, classihub.in and really verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which might have been scraped from an .

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my feline (I have no animals). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book composing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually offered around 150,000 customised books, primarily in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source large language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anybody developing one in anyone's name, experienciacortazar.com.ar consisting of celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the product is meant as a "personalised gag gift", surgiteams.com and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to widen his variety, producing various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human customers.

It's likewise a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound just like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is short articles, this is pictures. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to find out how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had actually not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were phony, it was still hugely popular.

"I do not believe using generative AI for creative purposes should be prohibited, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization need to be prohibited," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really powerful but let's build it fairly and fairly."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes market and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would enable AI developers to utilize creators' content on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders pull out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He points out that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of pleasure," says the Baroness, who is also a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its best carrying out industries on the vague promise of development."

A government representative stated: "No move will be made till we are absolutely positive we have a practical strategy that delivers each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their content, access to top quality product to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for right holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI plan, a nationwide information library including public data from a large range of sources will also be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the safety of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It remains to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI firms, and especially versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been gotten by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their permission, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can constitute reasonable usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it collects training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all sufficient to ponder, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being the a lot of downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for drapia.org a fraction of the cost of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually want a "bestseller" I'll still need to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It is full of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be rather hard to read in parts because it's so long-winded.

But offered how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the biggest developments in international technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents all over the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.